tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30094322.post1949371031952532451..comments2008-07-30T13:39:51.266+02:00Guillaume Nodethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16560449735432714687noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30094322.post-55806735589116434022008-07-30T13:39:00.000+02:002008-07-30T13:39:00.000+02:00Hi Guillaume,<BR/><BR/>I think your remarks on Ross's article are very solid. JBI components can be exchanged between different JBI containers (I used a PEtALS and Open ESB JBI component in ServiceMix). That's shows the potential of the JBI specification.<BR/>I really find both approaches, the JBI and the Mule architecture, viable for solving integration problems. I think Mule does a great job in solving integration problems where messages can be POJOs and where there's a need for custom logic in Javabeans. ServiceMix or JBI in general does a great job in environments where you predominantly use XML messages and you need hotdeploy functionality and an open standard implementation. So I see implementations for both approaches :-).<BR/><BR/>Best regards,<BR/><BR/>Tijs Rademakers<BR/>Author of Open Source ESBs in ActionTijs Rademakershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17377449002525504433noreply@blogger.com